Suzanne Stephens Re: Jeff [OT] image theft prevention question
Jun 16, 2004; 11:15
Suzanne Stephens
Re: Jeff [OT] image theft prevention question
hi Jeff,
Actually, it's not a matter of whether the coral looks good. There are at least three issues.
1) whether or not there is a WYSIWYG photo provided or just a generic representation of the species. Buying from non-WYSIWYG photos can be risky, since corals within a species vary widely in appearance.
The largest online dealer, www.liveaquaria.com , has a well-justified reputation for shipping corals that are better-looking than the buyer might expect. They do both WYSIWYG and non-WSIWYG.
2) whether the photo, especially if WYSIWYG, is a good quality photo, an honest representation, in focus, etc.
I bought from several online dealers last year just to check out the competition. When one coral that I'd purchased from a WYSIWYG photo arrived, I honestly couldn't figure out whether it was the same as I'd seen in the out-of-focus photo. This dealer has since gained a reputation in the reef-keeping forums for buying corals, photographing them, cutting pieces off to propagate from them, then selling the coral from the photo of it in its original condition.
www.tropicorium.com has grown to become one of the best known aquaculture shops in the U.S., in spite of their Web site. The worst are his photos of trays of aquacultured cuttings:
http://www.tropicorium.com/tsoft_corals.html
Then there are all kinds of other problems. In the following example, the mediocre photo is mislabeled as a Lobophyllia when, in fact, it's a Trachyphyllia Radiata. Trachyphyllia are much easier to care for than Lobophyllia (and they don't look very much alike). It's described as needing "strong light" when, in fact, this species can adapt to relatively low lighting and may die if placed under strong light without plenty of time to acclimate to gradually increasing amounts of light.
This site has numerous examples of inaccurate care recommendations, some grossly inaccurate.
3) An individual coral can vary in appearance drastically depending on time of day, lighting conditions, how long it has had to acclimate to a new environment, where it's at in its digestive cycle, etc. Some can take as long as several days to a few weeks to recover from being handled and extend their polyps. Many accumulate a waxy skin which they periodically shed to rid themselves of algae. They look dreadful just before and during the shed. Getting photos of corals looking their best takes a lof of time and patience.
Some don't like being moved and may shrink to a fraction of the normal size, taking several days to return to their usual glory. Here's a corner of a larger photo with two corals of the same species. "B" is unhappy because it was moved or touched. These Sinularia also shrink to stubby little stump-like blobs during lights out, then expand to graceful, arboreal, flowing shapes after the lights come on, increasing in height three or four times:
The Sinularia in that photo are progeny grown from small cuttings from the colony below, which lives in my living room aquarium and serves as a hiding place for a timid pink skunk clownfish.
http://www.culturedaquaria.com/happySinularia.jpg
Suz
On Jun 16, 2004, at 7:59 AM, Giesbrecht, Jeff wrote:
> Suz, > > I know this is getting a little off the topic you wanted feedback on > but > could you share some of the not so good-looking pictures. I'm having a > hard time understanding how a coral could not look nice no matter what. > :) > > Cheers, > Jeff
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <dreamweaver@lists.blueworld.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <dreamweaver-off@lists.blueworld.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <dreamweaver-digest@lists.blueworld.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <dreamweaver-index@lists.blueworld.com> Send administrative queries to <dreamweaver-admin@lists.blueworld.com> Dreamweaver Talk Archives: <http://www.listsearch.com/dreamweavertalk.lasso>
Jun 16
Suzanne Stephens Re: Jeff [OT] image theft prevention question
Jun 16, 2004; 11:27
Suzanne Stephens
Re: Jeff [OT] image theft prevention question
Jun 16
Michael Knauf Re: Jeff [OT] image theft prevention question
Jun 16, 2004; 11:31
Michael Knauf
Re: Jeff [OT] image theft prevention question
Jun 16
Suzanne Stephens Re: Jeff [OT] image theft prevention question
Jun 16, 2004; 11:45
Suzanne Stephens
Re: Jeff [OT] image theft prevention question
Jun 16
Giesbrecht, Jeff Re: Jeff [OT] image theft prevention question
Jun 16, 2004; 14:08
Giesbrecht, Jeff
Re: Jeff [OT] image theft prevention question
Search
Lasso Programming
This site manages and broadcasts several email lists pertaining to Lasso Programming and technologies related and used by Lasso developers. Sign up today!